Skip to content

Scientific · Sector explainer

Data a referee will accept.

Field campaigns, seismology, hydrology, ocean, ecology, polar and research-infrastructure gap filling. Six scenes, each a working calculation: the cost of a valid data-year, earthquake warning time at a school, a stream-gauge rating curve, wave physics at a buoy, a recorder’s storage and listening range, and the radio horizon of a quiet site.

Scenarios
6
Live calculations
6
Community fit
Strong

01 · Gap-filling nodes

Scenario

Price the data-year, not the box.

Observatory-as-a-service for research infrastructures that must extend coverage under their own quality rules. The number that matters to a research infrastructure is the cost of one valid year of data: the capital cost spread over the service life plus the running cost, divided by the share of the year the record passes quality control. Coverage follows from spacing: a square lattice of spacing s needs area / s² nodes, and the mean distance from any point to its nearest node is 0.383 s.

Cost per node-year
26.0 k
Cost per valid data-year
27.4 k
Nodes for the area
16
Mean distance to the nearest node
19.1 km
Network cost per year
416 k

02 · School seismographs

Scenario

Seconds of warning, counted honestly.

Compact seismographs feeding open data networks. In a typical crust the P wave travels at about 6.0 km/s and the damaging S wave at about 3.5 km/s. Each second between them puts the source about 8.4 km away, Vp·Vs/(Vp − Vs). Warning time at the school is the S-wave arrival less the time the nearest station needs to see the P wave and issue the alert; inside the blind zone, the shaking arrives first.

P arrival at the school
11.8 s
S arrival at the school
20.2 s
S − P interval
8.4 s → 71 km
Alert issued at
6.6 s
Warning at the school
13.6 s
Blind-zone radius
21 km

03 · Stream gauges

Scenario

Stage is measured. Flow is computed.

A low-cost tier beside national gauge networks. A gauge reads water level; discharge comes from the site’s rating curve, Q = a (h − h₀)b, fitted to current-meter or ADCP gaugings. The exponent sets how stage error turns into flow error: a stage error δh gives a relative flow error of about b · δh / (h − h₀), which is why low flows need the most careful level sensor.

Discharge
39.0 m³/s
Effective depth h − h₀
1.40 m
Flow error from stage error
±1.2 %
Flow error at a tenth of this depth
±12 %

04 · Wave buoys

Scenario

A wave is a period and a height.

A low-cost wave buoy measures heave and reports significant height and period over satellite. Linear wave theory turns those into what engineers need: the dispersion relation ω² = g k tanh(k d) gives the wavelength at any depth (gT²/2π in deep water), and the energy flux per metre of crest is ρ g H² cg / 16, about 0.49 H² T kW/m in deep water. A short-burst satellite message carries up to 340 bytes.

Wavelength
126 m
Phase speed
14.0 m/s
Regime (d / L)
Intermediate depth · 0.48
Wave energy flux
28.3 kW/m
Messages per day
48
Data per month
173 kB

05 · Bioacoustics

Scenario

Listen long, store wisely.

Open acoustic recorders for species baselines. Storage is sample rate times bit depth times the fraction of the day the recorder is on; the highest frequency recorded is half the sample rate, so bats need far more storage than birds. Listening range follows spherical spreading: a call is heard while its source level less 20 log r stays above the ambient noise by the detector’s required signal-to-noise ratio. Air absorption and foliage shorten it further, most of all above 10 kHz.

Sample rate

Bit depth

Memory card

Highest frequency recorded
24 kHz
Storage per day
2.07 GB
Days until the card is full
123 d
Listening radius
178 m
Area per recorder
9.9 ha

06 · Polar and quiet sites

Scenario

Free space never protects a telescope.

Autonomous stations with satellite backhaul in harsh environments. For a radio telescope the question is interference. Free-space loss, 20 log d + 20 log f + 32.44, is far too weak on its own: the distance it would take to bring a modest transmitter below a radio-astronomy protection level runs to hundreds of thousands of kilometres. What protects a site is the horizon and the terrain. With standard refraction the radio horizon between two antennas is about 4.12 (√h₁ + √h₂) km, heights in metres; a transmitter beyond it reaches the dish only by diffraction and scatter.

Observing frequency

Free-space loss
131.0 dB
Level at the feed, free space
-84.0 dBm
Above the protection level by
81.0 dB
Radio horizon
46.7 km
Transmitter position
Beyond the horizon
Free-space distance to reach the level
669,440 km

07 · Proof

Evidence

What a referee checks.

Research infrastructures accept a station when its data can be traced, read and cited. The grid keeps each piece of that evidence as a record beside the station it describes.

Show the record for

Asked for
Calibration traceability
Record kept
Calibration certificates and the reference chain to national standards, per sensor serial

—Proof

What buyers in science ask to see.

The grid produces each item as a record with the data it supports, not a report written afterwards.

01Calibration traceability

02data-format conformance (netCDF/CF, FDSN, OGC SensorThings, WIS2)

03datasets with persistent identifiers

04uptime in harsh environments

05cost per data-year

Bring us the site.

Tell us the site, the sector and what you need to observe. We bring the survey, the design and the crew.

Talk to usSector overview